Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection)

To: John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>, Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>, ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection)
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:09:45 -0800
In-reply-to: <74608441.1079095742@scan.jck.com>
References: <20040308132638.4a9014ba.moore@cs.utk.edu> <74608441.1079095742@scan.jck.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

John,

I think the things you describe have very many of the same ideals and targets as draft-loghney-what-standards, currently being discussed in newtrk, which still needs work and significant input to be converted from an idea to a workable process - we may have a rare case of singing in harmony here!

                  Harald

References:
- Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection)
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection)
  - From: John C Klensin

Prev by Date: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
Next by Date: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
Previous by thread: Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection)
Next by thread: Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.