Re: Principles of Spam-abatement

To: Vernon Schryver <vjs at calcite.rhyolite.com>
Subject: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
From: Dave Crocker <dhc at dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:34:27 -0800
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200403122141.i2CLfW0g089362@calcite.rhyolite.com>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
References: <4052216B.3050409@solidmatrix.com> <200403122141.i2CLfW0g089362@calcite.rhyolite.com>
Reply-to: Dave Crocker <dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Vernon,

VS> On the other hand, it would be distructive to let the IETF seriously
VS> consider supporting claims of the unfettered right to send mail
VS> regardless of the desires of mail targets and their duly appointed
VS> agents including ISPs or of entitlements to real Internet access
VS> at less than $50/month.


I'll probably regret pursuing this, but...

I have not seen any inclination of the IETF community to support such
claims, but from your statement, I fear it may have happened and I
missed it.

What are you referring to?

d/
--
 Dave Crocker <dcrocker-at-brandenburg-dot-com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>

References:
- Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
  - From: Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
  - From: Vernon Schryver

Prev by Date: [Fwd: [Ham-Linux] Be careful what you say]
Next by Date: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
Previous by thread: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
Next by thread: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Principles of Spam-abatement

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.