Re: Principles of Spam-abatement

To: Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb at guppylake.com>
Subject: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
From: Dave Crocker <dhc at dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:36:56 -0800
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <129F166C-7469-11D8-8500-000A9571873E@guppylake.com>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
References: <5F175C24-7454-11D8-8500-000A9571873E@guppylake.com> <g365d9j2pp.fsf@sa.vix.com> <129F166C-7469-11D8-8500-000A9571873E@guppylake.com>
Reply-to: Dave Crocker <dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Nathaniel,

NB> some of us want to discuss it in terms of property rights, and others
NB> of us want to discuss it in terms of human rights.


Unfortunately, the IETF mailing list is not a very good venue for either
topic, because most of the folks on the IETF mailing list have no
qualifications or special insight into these difficult issues.

Opinions, sure

But none of the essential insight required for making any meaningful
progress in such a discussion.


d/
--
 Dave Crocker <dcrocker-at-brandenburg-dot-com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>

Follow-Ups:
- Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
  - From: Nathaniel Borenstein

References:
- Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
  - From: Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
  - From: Paul Vixie
- Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
  - From: Nathaniel Borenstein

Prev by Date: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
Next by Date: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
Previous by thread: Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
Next by thread: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Principles of Spam-abatement

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.