Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apology Re: Principles of Spam-abatement



Did anyone expect professional behavior from someone who doesn't have an
AUP on their own sites, someone who supports demonstrated abusers, someone
who associates with court-proven liars, and someone who posts misleading
information about their own legal experiences?  I didn't.

Clearly, technical competence does not equate to honesty and integrity.  
It also does not equate to professional conduct.  

And of course, those who lack intelligence to make sensible arguments have
to resort to name-calling.  I'm surprised it took this long to resort to
name-calling.


		--Dean

On 18 Mar 2004, Paul Vixie wrote:

> egerck at nma.com (Ed Gerck) writes:
> 
> > Dean,
> > 
> > I'm not gonna feed the troll. ...
> 
> NOW you're not gonna feed the troll?  where's the "...any more!" ??
> 
> it does me no good to filter out postings from known whackjobs if you
> and others are just going to reply anyway, often including the very
> drivel that i'd avoided having to look at directly.
> 
> please show some self-restraint.
> 





Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.