Re: survey on Friday IETF sessions

[Aaron Falk <falk at ISI.EDU>]

On Jul 22, 2004, at 6:30 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:

>   I think it comes back to:
>     a) some groups probably shouldn't meet as often
>     b) some groups perhaps shouldn't exist at all
>     c) some groups need 6-10 hours of continuous face-time in which 
> they
>        can actually get things done. We have pushed such things to
>        interim meetings, sometimes with success, sometimes without.
>        The problem is that these groups get 4 hours at IETF, easily
>        fill that, and still feel that they didn't get everything done.


Perhaps we should raise the bar on what it takes to get a slot at the 
IETF meeting.  For example, try to come up with some objective criteria 
for what deserves a 1hr slot, 2hrs, multiple, etc.  This  might even 
nudge groups into making some additional progress  ("you can't have 
your meeting if you don't hit a/some milestones").

BTW, regarding the survey: there's only been 80 responses so far.  My 
take is that people don't care about the issue enough to voice their 
opinion.

--aaron


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf