![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:41:50 +1000 George Michaelson <ggm at apnic.net> wrote: >On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:36:39 +0300 "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca at avaya.com> wrote: > >>I do not believe that this is achievable. With the majority of other standards organizations meetings and industry events building their schedules on a week basis, avoiding major conflicts in the participants calendars would become an even more challenging task, close to mission impossible. > >I do not believe this is true. actually, its been pointed out to me this is painfully true. There are also loosers in re-scheduling. Some people will not benefit from my idea. Possibly many people. bodies like IEEE do back-to-back scheduling. (sigh) -George _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.