Re: Friday @ IETF61?

To: George Michaelson <ggm at apnic.net>
Subject: Re: Friday @ IETF61?
From: Melinda Shore <mshore at cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:24:21 -0400
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20040902200449.18e870a0@garlic.apnic.net>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

On Thursday, September 2, 2004, at 06:04 AM, George Michaelson wrote:

I call again for meetings run over the weekend. midweek to midweek.


While I'd certainly prefer to travel midweek, there are a couple
of problems with running midweek to midweek.  One is that some
people can't work on Saturday for religious reasons.  Another is
that you're doubling the chance of conflicting with another week-
long meeting.

Melinda


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?
  - From: Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC)

References:
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?
  - From: George Michaelson

Prev by Date: Re: Friday @ IETF61?
Next by Date: Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring)
Previous by thread: Re: Friday @ IETF61?
Next by thread: Re: Friday @ IETF61?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Friday @ IETF61?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.