Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring)

[Dean Anderson <dean at av8.com>]

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

> scenarios C and D envision incorporating the *support function* for the 
> IETF. The IETF would remain an undefined entity under these scenarios.
> 
> I've had another suggestion that the IETF (the real technical process 
> entity) should become a formally recognizable entity of some sort (possibly 
> an unincorporated organization). 

The IETF is already describted as an activity of the ISOC, which is
incorprated.

I think the IETF also has paid employees. Aren't these people paid by the
ISOC?  If not, please correct this information.

> But that's distinct from the idea of incorporating the support function,
> and is NOT described in the current document.



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf