![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
It seems to me that we are rapidly converging on one point of total IETF consensus:
Putting the IETF administrative function under ISOC requires a documented IETF-ISOC agreement (call it an MoU, a contract or something else - it IS a document, it IS an agreement and it DOES have two parties).
Agreed?
Agreed.
--Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.