 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> I think that we should have Foretec arrange all of the 2005 meetings > and run them, period. No arrangements to "transfer", etc. I second this. I have often lamented that the IETF takes way too long to do anything. But, this schedule for potentially transferring our meeting planning starting in 2005 seems too aggressive to me. That said, making other changes outlined in Carl's document (e.g., for IT support) before 2006 seems perfectly reasonable if we can reach consensus and get things going before then. allman -- Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/
Attachment:
pgpCaUYD302df.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.