![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
So Mineapolis (the mother of all IETF venues) is less bloodier to get
to? I am shocked. I would claim Ottawa is more accessible, colder,
cheaper and doesnt have wimpy tunnels - which makes it a perfect choice.
I think Minneapolis is a terrific venue - the facilities are great, meals are easy, etc. I've hosted a meeting in Ottawa, and while it's also a terrific venue it's not that easy to find facilities that can accommodate a meeting the size of the IETF. Toronto or Montreal would be a better bet in terms of meeting space.
I've been denied travel funds to a location that looked too much like a holiday spot, so I'm not much of an advocate for basing location decisions on whether or not I'd enjoy the locale - that can backfire. We've all heard jokes about the European Travel and Sightseeing Institute, right?
I used to be heavily involved with Usenix, which has a full-time meeting coordinator whose job is specifically to find and arrange meeting venues. I checked their events page recently and they've got locations for the annual conference pinned down through 2008.
Melinda
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.