Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here

["Joel M. Halpern" <joel at stevecrocker.com>]

I think that this (scenario 0) is the right approach to follow.  It appears 
to me to be the lowest risk path consistent with the needs that have been 
identified.


Two minor comments:
1) The references to "the IASF bank account" should probably be relaxed to 
"IASF fund accounts" or "IASF accounts".  As written, it presumes that 
there is exactly one bank account, and that separation of funds is by bank 
control.  While the later is probably a good idea, I don't think this BCP 
is the place to call that out.  And the exact number of bank accounts used 
by IASF (0, 1, 5, or ...) is not a concern for this BCP.

2) The schedule calls for seating the IAOC on January 15, and hiring the 
IAD by the end of January.  Given that the search committee can not be 
appointed until the board is seated, it seems that item is either an 
impossible schedule or assumes facts not in evidence.

Yours,
Joel M. Halpern


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf