RE: Adminrest: section 3.4

[sob at harvard.edu (Scott Bradner)]

Bert asks:
  Here is a new proposed text:

   3.4  Relationship of the IAOC to Existing IETF Leadership

   The IAOC is directly accountable to the IETF community for the
   performance of the IASA.  However, the nature of the IAOC's work
   involves treating the IESG and IAB as major internal customers
   of the administrative support.  The IAOC and the IAD should not
   consider their work successful unless the IESG and IAB are also
   satisfied with the administrative support that the IETF is
   receiving.

  Better? Other suggestions on how to capture the idea?

this is basically what I suggested (specifically to deal with the 
situation Bert talks about) so I'm fine with it

Scott

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf