Re: Issue #719: Transparency/Openness of the IAOC (IASA transition te

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Issue #719: Transparency/Openness of the IAOC (IASA transition te
From: sob at harvard.edu (Scott Bradner)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 20:23:30 -0500 (EST)
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

> I actually wonder if this is an issue for the IASA BCP document,
> because it is about the Transition Team Transparency.


I do not think it is

> So I propose to remobve it from the iasa-bcp queue or declare it
> as "No change needed".


makes sense to me

Scott

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Issue #719: Transparency/Openness of the IAOC (IASA transition te
  - From: Brian E Carpenter

Prev by Date: RE: New Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP
Next by Date: Organizationed spam RE: [Sip] WiMAX Summit'05 - Paris - France
Previous by thread: "connection latching" -- comments on rfc2401bis (draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2401bis-04.txt)]
Next by thread: Re: Issue #719: Transparency/Openness of the IAOC (IASA transition te
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Issue #719: Transparency/Openness of the IAOC (IASA transition te

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.