Re: Organizationed spam RE: [Sip] WiMAX Summit'05 - Paris - France

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Thomas Gal" <ThomasGal at LumenVox.com>
> To: <harald at alvestrand.no>
> Cc: <michelg at upperside.fr>; <info at upperside.fr>; <ietf at ietf.org>; <remi.scavenius at wanadoo.fr>; <peter.lewis at upperside.fr>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 5:35 PM
> Subject: Organizationed spam RE: [Sip] WiMAX Summit'05 - Paris - France
...
> Perhaps comments from a few more IETF folk could establish that this
> crap is not welcome, or is it just me?
...

I think it depends on the conference / CFP, the mailing list, and how specific
the posting is.  For example, if someone were to post information on a paper
directly relevant to my working group's work that was going to be presented
at some conference, I'd welcome such a posting.  If someone posted a generic
CFP for a conference with no keywords in common with what my working group
is doing, I'd object.  Between those two extremes are many shades of grey,
but for the working group lists I'm subscribed to, it hasn't been a real problem
for me.

Randy



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf