Re: Organizationed spam RE: [Sip] WiMAX Summit'05 - Paris - France
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Organizationed spam RE: [Sip] WiMAX Summit'05 - Paris - France
- To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>
- Subject: Re: Organizationed spam RE: [Sip] WiMAX Summit'05 - Paris - France
- From: Tim Chown <tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:05:17 +0000
- Cc: info at upperside.fr, ietf at ietf.org, remi.scavenius at wanadoo.fr, michelg at upperside.fr, ThomasGal at LumenVox.com, peter.lewis at upperside.fr
- In-reply-to: <D8E160695E193F8D7AE55851@gloppen.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
- List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- Mail-followup-to: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>, ThomasGal at LumenVox.com, michelg at upperside.fr, info at upperside.fr, ietf at ietf.org, remi.scavenius at wanadoo.fr, peter.lewis at upperside.fr
- References: <LV-SVRFyfL1QMaCAP6K000006bf@lv-svr.lumenvox.com> <D8E160695E193F8D7AE55851@gloppen.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
- Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 08:45:51AM +0100, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> Peter.lewis at upperside.fr has already been denied posting rights on at least
> one IETF WG mailing list because of this behaviour.
>
> Is it time to dig out RFC 3683/BCP 83?
>
> BTW - has anyone, anywhere ever seen a response from him/them when they
> have been asked to stop spamming the IETF lists?
No, I haven't. It is clearly a commercial posting, and should be blocked.
I have "soammed" v6ops and ipng in the past with an IPv6 event announcement,
but this was for a non-profit event, and although I didn't feel comfortable
doing so, I felt it was OK as a regular contributor to both WGs. I also
didn't get any complaints to me as it happens (thanks :)
I think both metrics should be applied when "spam" complaints arise.
Tim
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.