Re: Issue #719: Transparency/Openness of the IAOC (IASA transition te

To: Scott Bradner <sob at harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Issue #719: Transparency/Openness of the IAOC (IASA transition te
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 13:43:21 +0100
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20041216012330.92F6F18CC02@newdev.harvard.edu>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: IBM
References: <20041216012330.92F6F18CC02@newdev.harvard.edu>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Scott Bradner wrote:

I actually wonder if this is an issue for the IASA BCP document,
because it is about the Transition Team Transparency.


I do not think it is

So I propose to remobve it from the iasa-bcp queue or declare it
as "No change needed".

makes sense to me


Agreed
    Brian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: Issue #719: Transparency/Openness of the IAOC (IASA transition te
  - From: Scott Bradner

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.