![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Inline > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces at ietf.org]On Behalf Of > Harald Tveit Alvestrand > Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 10:49 > To: ietf at ietf.org > Subject: Consensus? Minor issue #730: Section 2.2 - Authority over > standards development > > > Old text: > > >> 2. The IAD, IAOC and ISOC shall not have any authority over the IETF > >> standards development activities. > > Issue: ISOC already has a role in IETF standards development > activities. > > Suggested new text: > > > 2. The IAD and IAC shall not have any authority over the IETF > > standards development activities, and this document does not > > confer any new authority or responsibilities to ISOC regarding > > IETF standards development. > > Resolution: > > Slight modification of the suggested text: > > 2. The IAD and IAOC shall not have any authority over the IETF > standards development activities. This document does not > modify ISOC's other roles related to the IETF standars process. > > (Reason: This doc neither expands nor contracts the existing > responsbilities) > > OK? > fine. And I will fix s/standars/standards/ Bert > Harald > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf at ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.