Re: Issue #745: Section 3.1 - ISOC involvment in budget

To: bwijnen at lucent.com, sob at harvard.edu
Subject: Re: Issue #745: Section 3.1 - ISOC involvment in budget
From: sob at harvard.edu (Scott Bradner)
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 14:49:43 -0500 (EST)
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550604ECA8@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

> Scoot, I believe that we have also resolved that issue
> implicitly by resolving issue749. Do you agree?

not being someone who memorizes issue numbers I had to look these up
but I think you are correct

Scott

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Issue #745: Section 3.1 - ISOC involvment in budget
  - From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)

Prev by Date: Issue #745: Section 3.1 - ISOC involvment in budget
Next by Date: Re: Issue #755: Section 5.6 - Building a surplus [was RE: Building a surplus]
Previous by thread: Issue #745: Section 3.1 - ISOC involvment in budget
Next by thread: The Font top-level MIME type registration I-D
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Issue #745: Section 3.1 - ISOC involvment in budget

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.