Re: Rough consensus? #425 3.5

[Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>]

>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Bradner <sob at harvard.edu> writes:

    Scott> ps - I'm not sure that its all that useful to be able to
    Scott> appeal/review awards if they can not be overturned -
    Scott> apealing or reviewing the process that was followed is fine
    Scott> but appealling the actual award seems broken

I disagree.  Reviewing a specific decision in an operational context
to determine whether the right decision was made can be a useful
feedback step in a control loop of a system.  I've found this to be
true whether systems are technical or manigerial.

--Sam

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf