Re: Rough consensus? #425 3.5

[Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>]

>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Bradner <sob at harvard.edu> writes:

    Scott> I agree that postmortems can be useful but I'm not sure
    Scott> that doing such on a decision to hire Bill instead of Fred
    Scott> is one of those cases where it woudl be useful, feasiable
    Scott> (due to confidential info including recommendations) or
    Scott> produce any useful results (unless teh reason to hire Bill
    Scott> was that he was the IAD's dad)


I agree it will be rarely useful.  However rarely useful is not a
strong enough justification for prohibited from my standpoint.

The IAOC should have wide discretion in deciding how much effort to
spend on reviews.  Perhaps the IAOC should even have wide discretion
in establishing rules for reviews.  They might even want to establish
rules (subject themselves to review) that prohibit certain kinds of
review if that becomes necessary.

However Margaret has made an argument I find compelling that there is
not going to be a DOS condition under the current proposals.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf