Re: Mud. Clear as. Re: Rough consensus? #425 3.5

[Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>]

I don't think I can support your proposed text.  I still don't
understand what your proposed section 3.5 does and don't think I could
go along with the plausable readings I'm coming up with for that text.

I don't think your text does a good job of meeting the principles
Margaret tried to outline; in particular it seems to fail to meet the
principle on escalation.  I'd be very interested in an explanation of
how you think it compares to those principles.

--Sam


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf