As there a PERSON email address at the IESG?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

As there a PERSON email address at the IESG?




Each time I ask a question I get a reply saying that the 'transaction appears to have no content'.

Something broken?

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Inquiry #50155] AutoReply: Could a PERSON reply please.
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:15:33 -0400
From: IETF-IESG-Support via RT <iesg-secretary at ietf.org>
Reply-To: iesg-secretary at ietf.org
To: Doug at Royer.com


Greetings,

This message has been automatically generated in response to the
creation of a ticket regarding:
	"Could a PERSON reply please.",
a summary of which appears below.

There is no need to reply to this message right now.  Your ticket has been
assigned an ID of [Inquiry #50155] in the queue: IETF-IESG-Support.

Please include the string:

         [Inquiry #50155]

in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To do so,
you may reply to this message.


                        Thank you,
                        iesg-secretary at ietf.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This transaction appears to have no content

--

Doug Royer                     | http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------

              We Do Standards - You Need Standards

begin:vcard
fn:Doug Royer
n:Royer;Doug
org:INET-Consuiting.com
adr:;;2756 N. GreenValley Pkwy #845;Henderson;NV;89014;U.S.A
email;internet:Doug at Royer.com
title:CEO
tel;work:208-612-4638
tel;fax:866-494-8574
tel;cell:208-520-4044
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://Royer.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.