Re: Voting (again)

To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>
Subject: Re: Voting (again)
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 00:22:24 -0400
Cc: hartmans-ietf at mit.edu, moore at cs.utk.edu, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD372501A8@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD372501A8@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

> It is extreemly unlikely that a NOMCON is ever going to change more than
> a small number of ADs because they understand that they have no mandate.

so in your mind, unless they kill off a lot of ADs, there's no accountability?
what a crock.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- RE: Voting (again)
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Prev by Date: RE: Voting (again)
Next by Date: Re: Voting (again)
Previous by thread: RE: Voting (again)
Next by thread: Re: Voting (again)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Voting (again)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.