Re: Voting (again)

To: Joe Touch <touch at ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: Voting (again)
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:20:40 -0700
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <426EC9E7.7040007@isi.edu>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Dave Crocker <dcrocker at bbiw.net>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

>  Why isn't a larger number of "ADs" - or, more specifically, removing the
>  review process from the ADs and having a real review group, the solution
>  here?


1. the repeated assessment has been that the aggregate size of the iesg is at
its limit, for getting anything done.

2. if the work being done has too much effort on the wrong tasks, it does not
help things to have more people doing the wrong things.


  d/
  ---
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Voting (again)
  - From: Joe Touch
- Re: Voting (again)
  - From: Keith Moore

References:
- Re: Voting (again)
  - From: Joe Touch

Prev by Date: Re: Voting (again)
Next by Date: Re: Voting (again)
Previous by thread: Re: Voting (again)
Next by thread: Re: Voting (again)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Voting (again)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.