Important protocol development

To: The IETF <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Important protocol development
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole at cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 07:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Ole Jacobsen <ole at cisco.com>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

May I suggest that we consider starting a working group on this:


http://www.notes.co.il/benbasat/10991.asp


(Paris may not be the right venue as you will discover).

Ole


Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Academic Research and Technology Initiatives, Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   GSM: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole at cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Important protocol development
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again))
Next by Date: Re: Voting (again)
Previous by thread: Concorde / Etoile for IETF 63?
Next by thread: Re: Important protocol development
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Important protocol development

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.