Re: Important protocol development

To: Ole Jacobsen <ole at cisco.com>, The IETF <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Important protocol development
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:58:42 -0700
Cc:
In-reply-to: <Pine.HPX.4.58.0504270721060.27112@wells.cisco.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Dave Crocker <dcrocker at bbiw.net>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

Ole >  May I suggest that we consider starting a working group on this:

iRtf, perhaps, but not iEtf, yet. It's still in the research phase.

Both robustness and distance sensitivity need to be assessed, before it will
be appropriate for the standards process.

In addition, the LGS requirement would seem to have pretty onerous long-term
administrative overhead...


  d/
  ---
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Important protocol development
  - From: Aaron Falk
- Re: Important protocol development
  - From: Marshall Eubanks

References:
- Important protocol development
  - From: Ole Jacobsen

Prev by Date: Re: Voting (again)
Next by Date: Re: Important protocol development
Previous by thread: Important protocol development
Next by thread: Re: Important protocol development
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Important protocol development

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.