Re: Separated document review [Re: Voting (again)]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Separated document review [Re: Voting (again)]



> What went wrong with ICAR (Improved Cross-Area Review)?  It was closed
> due to lack of activity; 12 people enlisted as reviewers, just a
> single review conducted, the reviewers didn't deliver.

I think your conclusion that "the reviewers didn't deliver" might be taken
poorly by the reviewers on the list who weren't asked to deliver.

Don't blame the reviewers if no I-D authors or WG chairs asked for
cross-area review. That only one review was conducted might be taken to
mean that only one review was requested. What does that tell us about the
process?

Adrian


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.