Re: Important protocol development

To: Aaron Falk <falk at ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: Important protocol development
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:46:44 -0700
Cc: Ole Jacobsen <ole at cisco.com>, The IETF <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <20050429003625.GC2618@isi.edu>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Dave Crocker <dcrocker at bbiw.net>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

> >  iRtf, perhaps, but not iEtf, yet. It's still in the research phase.
> >
>
>  Hmm.  Dave, are you suggesting a research group on wheel-reinvention
>  protocols?  Or perhaps, snail-paced transport?

Well, I was only looking at the generic presence of open, basic questions.

But now that you make the reference to snail-paced work, I retract my
suggestion.

Clearly it is exactly right for the IETF.


  d/
  ---
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: Important protocol development
  - From: Aaron Falk

Prev by Date: Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again))
Next by Date: Re: text suggested by ADs
Previous by thread: Re: Important protocol development
Next by thread: RE: Important protocol development
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Important protocol development

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.