![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hi Phillip,
This information is on the 'Working Group Chairs' page, not the 'ID
authors' page or more usefully the Internet drafts page.
The I-D tracker *is* actually on the Internet drafts page (I think this was a recent change):
http://www.ietf.org/ID.html
But in general, yes, we could use more information and easier availability. I confess that I don't even remember where the RFC status page is. But there's been many improvements of this type lately, like what the tools team is working on now that allows you to get a better view of the overall ID/RFC status in a working from single page etc. See e.g. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/
The current IETF Web site appears to have been written by someone whose ideal of user documentation is the UNIX man pages.
I don't understand -- what could ever be better than a UNIX man page? ;-)
--Jari
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.