Re: Moving forward on IETF problems

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Moving forward on IETF problems
From: Bruce Lilly <blilly at erols.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 13:47:28 -0400
Cc:
In-reply-to: <4278E7E3.4070907@zurich.ibm.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Bruce Lilly
References: <200505020904.21595.blilly@erols.com> <4278E7E3.4070907@zurich.ibm.com>
Reply-to: Bruce Lilly <blilly at erols.com>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: KMail/1.8

On Wed May 4 2005 11:18, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Bruce Lilly wrote:

> > One problem is that the IESG routinely sabotages development along
> 
> That is, I think, an inappropriate choice of word.

OK, s/sabotages/undermines/

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Moving forward on IETF problems
  - From: Bruce Lilly
- Re: Moving forward on IETF problems
  - From: Brian E Carpenter

Prev by Date: Re: improving WG operation
Next by Date: Re: improving WG operation
Previous by thread: Re: Moving forward on IETF problems
Next by thread: Re: Moving forward on IETF problems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Moving forward on IETF problems

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.