Re: IETF Throughput (was RE: Voting (again))

[Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>]

Brian,

>     But unfortunately the
>  IESG still receives a fair number of documents with fairly serious
>  technical issues and/or serious editorial issues. As long as that is true,
>  I really don't see how we can take away the IESG's responsibility as the
>  back stop for quality, especially for cross-area issues.


I have not seen anything like a groundswell of suggestions that the IESG-based
quality assurrance function be ended and I do not expect to see it, for
exactly the reason you cite.

However retaining that IESG function does not require that individual ADs
continue to have veto.  Ralph Drom's recent postings in this regard are
particularly cogent.


  d/
  ---
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf