"straightforward, reasonable, and fair"

To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker at bbiw.net>
Subject: "straightforward, reasonable, and fair"
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 18:24:56 -0400
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <200554123122.243520@bbprime>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200554123122.243520@bbprime>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org


  This isn't likely to succeed.

  It is too straightforward, reasonable and fair.

and with my sarcasm mode turned off:

  This sounds like an excellent suggestion.

It is straightforward, reasonable and fair.

why am I reminded of "Harrison Bergeron" ? (if you haven't read it, google for it)

or for that matter _Atlas Shrugged_? (not that I agree with Rand on everything, but she had this one pegged)

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "straightforward, reasonable, and fair"
  - From: Ralph Droms

References:
- Re: text suggested by ADs
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again))
Next by Date: Re: What's the value of specification consistency?
Previous by thread: Re: text suggested by ADs
Next by thread: Re: "straightforward, reasonable, and fair"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

"straightforward, reasonable, and fair"

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.