Re: improving WG operation

To: Yakov Rekhter <yakov at juniper.net>
Subject: Re: improving WG operation
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 13:56:00 -0400
Cc: moore at cs.utk.edu, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200505061649.j46GnCe69299@merlot.juniper.net>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20050502160644.04dafa00.moore@cs.utk.edu> <200505061649.j46GnCe69299@merlot.juniper.net>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

> So, if there is indeed the IETF community expectation that the WG
> gets to pick at least some of its own chairs, then rfc3710 needs
> to be revised to reflect this.

not necessarily.  a significant part of the community can expect something 
and there still not be rough consensus about it.



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: improving WG operation
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: improving WG operation
  - From: Yakov Rekhter

Prev by Date: Re: improving WG operation
Next by Date: Re: "straightforward, reasonable, and fair"
Previous by thread: Re: improving WG operation
Next by thread: Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: improving WG operation

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.