Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again))

[Geoff Huston <gih at apnic.net>]

> And there is some risk (small, I think) of people pushing others to 
> endorse them.  This would seem easier with a public list, because the 
> nomcom is not left wondering why they got the supportive email.

A risk not without quite extensive precedent over the years, and the 
concept of overt electioneering is one that personally I find a strange 
perversion of an already somewhat strange process. Are we after the the 
judgement of a few as to the best qualified individual for the role, or the 
one who is seen as being the "most popular" on the basis of a concerted 
campaign of electioneering? What is this body again? What is its purpose? 
Why does it exist? etc.

Geoff



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf