Re: Moving forward on IETF problems

To: Allison Mankin <mankin at psg.com>
Subject: Re: Moving forward on IETF problems
From: ned.freed at mrochek.com
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 07:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Bruce Lilly <blilly at erols.com>, ned.freed at mrochek.com, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 06:58:23 -0700" <01LO1N80OAIY002QET@mauve.mrochek.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <brc@zurich.ibm.com> <427F68A4.7090100@zurich.ibm.com> <01LO1N80OAIY002QET@mauve.mrochek.com>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

> Brian, and others,

> I do have experience of WGs that care about DS.

So do I. But this has not been the norm in my experience.

				Ned

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moving forward on IETF problems
  - From: Brian E Carpenter

References:
- Re: Moving forward on IETF problems
  - From: Brian E Carpenter

Prev by Date: Re: Moving forward on IETF problems
Next by Date: Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again))
Previous by thread: Re: Moving forward on IETF problems
Next by thread: Re: Moving forward on IETF problems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Moving forward on IETF problems

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.