![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I don't understand why making names public would increase electioneering over what we already have.
"Electioneering" is perhaps the wrong word, since it implies behavior on the part of the candidates. What I'm thinking about is pressure from interested parties. Right now, for example, the process does a pretty good job of protecting itself from situations in which a company decides that it really needs to have someone on the IESG, or ones in which a bunch of people want to push a particular technology through and need to get IESG support.
Melinda
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.