Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again))

[Ralph Droms <rdroms at cisco.com>]

Ah, but the candidates know who they are, and can arrange their own
positive input.

If the list were open, might the nomcom receive more and better balanced
input?

- Ralph

On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 13:49 -0400, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On May 9, 2005, at 1:42 PM, Scott W Brim wrote:
> > I don't understand why making names public would increase
> > electioneering over what we already have.
> 
> "Electioneering" is perhaps the wrong word, since it implies
> behavior on the part of the candidates.  What I'm thinking about
> is pressure from interested parties.  Right now, for example, the
> process does a pretty good job of protecting itself from situations
> in which a company decides that it really needs to have someone on
> the IESG, or ones in which a bunch of people want to push a
> particular technology through and need to get IESG support.
> 
> Melinda
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf