Re: Moving forward on IETF problems

[Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>]

ned.freed at mrochek.com wrote:
> > Brian, and others,
>
>
> > I do have experience of WGs that care about DS.
>
>
> So do I. But this has not been the norm in my experience.

If you think back to when we were discussing a one-stage
standards track in newtrk, I at least was arguing for the
importance of interoperability reports even in a one-stage
system. The value in the DS label is surely the knowledge
that an interop report has been presented and accepted. And that's
why I conceded that I could live with a two-stage process
(although I still think one stage plus interop reports would
be just fine).

   Brian (speaking only for myself)


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf