Re: improving WG operation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: improving WG operation



Hi -

> From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey at jefsey.com>
> To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>
> Cc: <ietf at ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 5:29 PM
> Subject: RE: improving WG operation
...
> They do not not only delete. I suggest you just come to the WG-ltru where
> they have decided to document RFC 2277 charsets into RFC 3066 langtags. So
> you can enjoy charset conflicts, something you never though about, I
> presume. You cannot stop progress.
...

I guess Jefsey is upset because the WG rejected his proposal
to expand our scope to include charsets.  The ltru WG is most
emphatically *not* confusing charsets with language tags.

Randy, ltru co-chair




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.