Re: Uneccesary slowness.

["James M. Polk" <jmpolk at cisco.com>]

At 08:22 PM 5/14/2005 -0400, Will McAfee wrote:
> I think the minimum time before a document can pass to another
> standards-track state is ridiculously long.  If an rfc is huge, I can
> understand that.  But to sweep that over all of them?  A two-page
> proposed standard can take an absolutely ridiculous amount of time to
> pass through!

each of the normative references need to be at that higher level too 
though... even for your 2 page PS-RFC

> I say we have variations based on how long the document
> is.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


cheers,
James

                                *******************
                Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented.

                     Alas, few *truths* exist without the math.

                            ...all else is a matter of perspective

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf