Re: Uneccesary slowness.

[Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>]

This would be a good topic for the newtrk WG, I think,
since it is so specific.

   Brian

James M. Polk wrote:
> At 08:22 PM 5/14/2005 -0400, Will McAfee wrote:
>
> > I think the minimum time before a document can pass to another
> > standards-track state is ridiculously long.  If an rfc is huge, I can
> > understand that.  But to sweep that over all of them?  A two-page
> > proposed standard can take an absolutely ridiculous amount of time to
> > pass through!
>
>
> each of the normative references need to be at that higher level too 
> though... even for your 2 page PS-RFC
>
> > I say we have variations based on how long the document
> > is.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf mailing list
> > Ietf at ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
>
>
> cheers,
> James
>
>                                 *******************
>                 Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented.
>
>                      Alas, few *truths* exist without the math.
>
>                             ...all else is a matter of perspective
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf