Re: More pretty graphs

["Spencer Dawkins" <spencer at mcsr-labs.org>]

Bill, thank you for developing this tool and for posting the note 
about it to ietf at ietf.org.

Spencer

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Fenner" <fenner at gmail.com>


Based on the positive feedback from my RFC-Editor graph, I've updated
some work that I started some time ago - a set of graphs, two per
working group.  These graphs show inter-document dependencies(*) of
all I-Ds that are working group documents, and one "hop" forwards and
back - for example, if a foowg document depends on
draft-fenner-great-stuff, then the individual draft shows up, but not
*that* document's dependencies.  The two graphs are <wgname>.pdf,
which includes relationships that my script could determine are not
normative, and <wgname>-norm.pdf which does not.  Sometimes when the
full graph is too much, the -norm graph is still readable.

It's an interesting way to see what relationships exist, and what
other groups / documents may be referencing a given WG's work.

http://rtg.ietf.org/~fenner/ietf/deps/viz/

Each page includes a key for what the shapes and colors mean.
Feedback is welcome.

 Bill 




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf