Re: More pretty graphs

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: More pretty graphs
From: Bill Fenner <fenner at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 11:08:21 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SLrZ/exYkD0ASb7K1C8e0gx1Ikhw2pIhkCfYBzW24JoUx7fTlA3nA9DTDiFol+2PEcFh0Epdbn/hDJ9o7XwhdwTBP1NslJvHsTZoErsaPMCjm4qaN36Rgd9WvmzP2rVnID3q25nZZXcry3qWXOwMpWmx7nnolVOBBO7z4LslNPE=
In-reply-to: <200505170558.51174.blilly@erols.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <42ut2e$jnea2@mx21.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <200505170558.51174.blilly@erols.com>
Reply-to: Bill Fenner <fenner at gmail.com>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

On 5/17/05, Bruce Lilly <blilly at erols.com> wrote:
> Interesting, but the key could be clarified

I've tried to clarify the key, and have added a red diamond for
"nonexistent I-D" (which was previously confusingly represented as an
individual expired document).

  Bill

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: More pretty graphs
  - From: Bruce Lilly

Prev by Date: Re: Uneccesary slowness.
Next by Date: Re: Uneccesary slowness.
Previous by thread: Re: More pretty graphs
Next by thread: The Best Affiliate Program Period!!!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: More pretty graphs

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.