Re: Uneccesary slowness.

[Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>]

On May 18, 2005, at 8:50 PM, Margaret Wasserman wrote:

> Seriously, I am operating under the assumption that timely review  
> and processing of WG charters and WG documents is more important to  
> the community than timely processing of RFC Editor individual  
> submissions, and the fact that I do not always manage to process  
> individual submissions on time reflects that prioritization.
>
> Are there really a significant number of people who think it should  
> be otherwise?

Individual submissions are an important part of our process, and in  
many cases it is important for IESG to review them.  I think it is  
necessary for IESG to manage its WG workload in such a way that it  
has some amount of time left over to process individual submissions.   
In other words, a discipline that gives strict priority to WG work  
might not be appropriate.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf