Re: draft-harris-ssh-arcfour-fixes-02: informational or proposed?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-harris-ssh-arcfour-fixes-02: informational or proposed?



> The argument in favor of publishing this document at proposed is that
> the existing arcfour cipher is part of a standard and that many other
> IETF protocols use rc4 in standards track documents.

previous mistakes are not valid justifications for new mistakes.
previous accidents are not valid justifications for deliberately weakening
new products.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.