Re: IANA Considerations

To: Bruce Lilly <blilly at erols.com>
Subject: Re: IANA Considerations
From: Bill Fenner <fenner at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:25:10 -0400
Cc: Ned Freed <ned.freed at mrochek.com>, ietf at ietf.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kd1XJjw/vsunUQ9Fcp06n74DVETdztj4iJqbebexd68nqn6nEy1jcdiRjUYtAgXfaKMgBOn0oWCDaoNjKN9YSed1JmMI0t58NpUIDtq6Q4f9PkLLXbii4n/plY9LqJPbfS8pHJRY1EwTgoSEgoequQHHLuXodsRdNOuICRnt18g=
In-reply-to: <200506091332.58550.blilly@erols.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <42ut2e$2gut56@mx21.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <200506081359.20078.blilly@erols.com> <01LP7TPWB4KQ00004T@mauve.mrochek.com> <200506091332.58550.blilly@erols.com>
Reply-to: Bill Fenner <fenner at gmail.com>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

On 6/9/05, Bruce Lilly <blilly at erols.com> wrote:
> Conversely, if the IESG does regard the matter as important, it could:
> 1. direct the IETF Secretariat to enforce the rule

Bruce,

  ID-Checklist is only for I-Ds that are submitted to the IESG for
publication.  It's not the cost of checking that is a problem, rather,
it's useful to allow earlier drafts of I-Ds to not be fully fleshed
out (thus they're .. well .. drafts?)

  Bill

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IANA Considerations
  - From: Fred Baker

References:
- IANA Considerations
  - From: Bruce Lilly
- Re: IANA Considerations
  - From: Ned Freed
- Re: IANA Considerations
  - From: Bruce Lilly

Prev by Date: Re: IANA Considerations
Next by Date: Re: IANA Considerations
Previous by thread: Re: IANA Considerations
Next by thread: Re: IANA Considerations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IANA Considerations

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.