Re: IANA Considerations

[Pekka Savola <pekkas at netcore.fi>]

On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Ned Freed wrote:
> > What exactly is it that you
> > think should be done (in addition to careful reviews) that would help
> > reduce the odds that the careful review find issues with the IANA
> > instructions (or lack thereof)?
>
> Simple: The requirement that an  IANA considerations section be included in RFC
> not containing any IANA actions needs to be dropped. I have been extremely
> clear ahout this.

It's good, because this is already the case.  Even if you're required 
to add a "null" IANA considerations section in the internet-drafts 
when being sent to the IESG, the RFC-editor removes the IANA 
considerations section completely if it doesn't have any real content.

Anything else?

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf