![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> > at the very least it illustrates that using vague terms in a technical > > specification without defining those terms can lead to misunderstanding. > > Keith, the problem with pushing so hard to win a point, without actually reading > things carefully, is that the material often does not substantiate the point. > > What you are so winningly touting was not, as you indicate, a problem with the > text, but a problem with my use of a different term in this thread. Dave, I disagree. I think this illustrates that you don't have a clear handle on what you are talking about. rather than try so hard to deny that the text is ambiguous, why not just fix the text? Keith _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.