Re: IANA Considerations
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IANA Considerations



from my very humble perspective, it is actually useful to test a -00 draft. The more revisions a draft goes through, the more reticent and author becomes to change it. Getting the test done early makes that job easier.


On Jun 10, 2005, at 7:25 AM, Bill Fenner wrote:

On 6/9/05, Bruce Lilly <blilly at erols.com> wrote:
Conversely, if the IESG does regard the matter as important, it could:
1. direct the IETF Secretariat to enforce the rule

Bruce,

  ID-Checklist is only for I-Ds that are submitted to the IESG for
publication.  It's not the cost of checking that is a problem, rather,
it's useful to allow earlier drafts of I-Ds to not be fully fleshed
out (thus they're .. well .. drafts?)

  Bill

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
This message was passed through ietf_censored at carmen.ipv6.cselt.it, which is a sublist of ietf at ietf.org. Not all messages are passed. Decisions on what to pass are made solely by IETF_CENSORED ML Administrator (ietf_admin at ngnet.it).



_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.